Subject: Re: distinfo files for multiple architectures
To: David Brownlee <email@example.com>
From: None <firstname.lastname@example.org>
Date: 05/08/2001 11:58:51
On Tue, 8 May 2001, David Brownlee wrote:
> On Tue, 8 May 2001 email@example.com wrote:
> > On Tue, 8 May 2001, David Brownlee wrote:
> > > citrix_ica has a distinfo.i386 and distinfo.sparc, while navigator
> > > keeps different architectures in the same distinfo file (and needs
> > > more care when rebuilding distinfos)
> > >
> > > Currently lintpkgsrc will miss the citrix_ica distinfos and
> > > incorrectly report the distfiles as unused. (This can obviously
> > > be fixed :)
> > >
> > > Can we standardise on one way to handle this, and which should
> > > it be?
> > the killer was the different patches needed.... i'm open to suggestions.
> Hmm - are the patches incompatible, or are the scripts to patch
> just in a different location?
> If the latter, have a pre-patch phase the creates a symlink to
> the file to patch...
there is a "solaris" subdir in one distfile and "linuxx" in the other, so
the file to be patched doesn't even exist on one arch or the other.