On Tue, 8 May 2001 mcmahill@mtl.mit.edu wrote:

> On Tue, 8 May 2001, David Brownlee wrote:
>
> > 	citrix_ica has a distinfo.i386 and distinfo.sparc, while navigator
> > 	keeps different architectures in the same distinfo file (and needs
> > 	more care when rebuilding distinfos)
> >
> > 	Currently lintpkgsrc will miss the citrix_ica distinfos and
> > 	incorrectly report the distfiles as unused. (This can obviously
> > 	be fixed :)
> >
> > 	Can we standardise on one way to handle this, and which should
> > 	it be?
>
>
> the killer was the different patches needed....  i'm open to suggestions.

	Hmm - are the patches incompatible, or are the scripts to patch
	just in a different location?

	If the latter, have a pre-patch phase the creates a symlink to
	the file to patch...
-- 
		David/absolute		-- www.netbsd.org: No hype required --