Subject: Re: Perl packlist
To: Frederick Bruckman < (Johnny C. Lam),>
From: Emmanuel Dreyfus <>
List: tech-pkg
Date: 04/17/2001 20:15:08
> ${LOCALBASE}/share/mk/, it may have defined all of the
> PERL5_* variables to their perl-5.00404 values.  Please check if this
> is the case by browsing through that file,=20

Yes, that's it, I have 5.00404 in that file.=20

On Tue, 17 Apr 2001, Johnny C. Lam wrote:
> If that's the case, then it proves that the perl-mk package was a
> mistake. The whole point of installing a make fragment in the first
> place, was that the locations were set at build time, and so should
> never need to be re-computed. The idea would be foolproof, if the
> fragment were simply installed with perl-base as originally proposed.

Well obviously there is a problem with perl-mk.
Emmanuel Dreyfus.
"L'achitecture x86 est impossible =E0 aimer." (John Hennessy)