Subject: Re: pkgsrc reorg proposal II
To: None <email@example.com>
From: David Brownlee <firstname.lastname@example.org>
Date: 01/03/2001 09:54:15
Looks good. I'd still prefer all the patches to be put
together in one patch file - I'm more than willing to write
any tools to automatically split/rejoin/etc.
I'd be tempted to keep a single subdir for the less predictibly
named files (scripts/files). Most packages do not have them, and
can have the directory omitted.
Any milage in merging the two *-sum files?
David/absolute -- www.netbsd.org: No hype required --
On Wed, 3 Jan 2001 email@example.com wrote:
> 0. Initial proposal:
> 1. Refined proposal:
> old filename new filename variable
> patches/patch-* -> patch-* PATCHDIR
> files/md5 -> dist-sum MD5_FILE
> files/patch-sum -> patch-sum PATCH_SUM_FILE
> pkg/PLIST* -> plist* PLIST_SRC
> pkg/COMMENT -> comment COMMENT
> pkg/DESCR -> descr DESCR_SRC
> pkg/INSTALL -> install INSTALL_FILE
> pkg/DEINSTALL -> deinstall DEINSTALL_FILE
> pkg/MESSAGE -> message MESSAGE_FILE
> scripts/* -> * SCRIPTDIR
> files/* -> *  -
>  Where possible - there are a number of pkgs that have a files/Makefile
> or similar. Must be renamed to prevent clash.
> 2. Procedure:
> The idea is to drop what's not needed of the current repository, and
> start a new one. We have two ways here:
> a) Checkout, reorg, import our ~1800 pkgs.
> This approach will also drop all revision history.
> b) Copy over all the ,v files (that are not in Attic) into a new
> repository, then reorg there. This approach will keep revision
> history of the files that are not deleted, but still speed up
> "cvs update" later as there are no Attic directories that are
> first created and then removed again immediately.
> My preference here is b).
> - Hubert