Subject: Re: Volunteers wanted for NetBSD-FreshPorts interface
To: Dan Langille <firstname.lastname@example.org>
From: Hubert Feyrer <email@example.com>
Date: 12/28/2000 11:10:29
On Thu, 28 Dec 2000, Dan Langille wrote:
> Hubert: I know you've already seen this response from Adam, but it
> didn't get CC'd to the list. Hence this second message.
Actually, I don't see it here... dunno what went wrong again. :/
> > Wouldn't it be clearer to not stuff all that data as parameters into the
> > MESSAGE and FILE tags, but rather give them sub-items(or what's that
> > called?):
> So, I guess that's where I stand; responses are always welcome...
It was just a quick idea without mugh thought behind - and as a matter of
taste as you say it's not that important either. As long as it doesn't
make parsing more difficult - fine! :)
Hubert Feyrer <firstname.lastname@example.org>