Subject: Re: changing 'install-depends' output
To: David Brownlee <firstname.lastname@example.org>
From: Hubert Feyrer <email@example.com>
Date: 11/14/2000 17:13:40
On Tue, 14 Nov 2000, David Brownlee wrote:
> I actually quite like the 'NOT', to make it more obvious something
> odd/wrong is happening. Actually I wouldn't mind 'make install'
> failing if all dependencies are not found, and have to run
> 'make install IGNORE_MISSING_DEPENDS=1' to bypass that.
> (I'd want the failure message to mention IGNORE_MISSING_DEPENDS :)
Eh, why castrate your fine dependency system???
We keep track of how we can build dependencies automatically if they
aren't found, and there is NO reason not to do this.
Hubert Feyrer <firstname.lastname@example.org>