Subject: Re: Sub package proposal
To: TAKEMURA Shin <email@example.com>
From: Hubert Feyrer <firstname.lastname@example.org>
Date: 11/14/2000 06:38:15
On Tue, 14 Nov 2000, TAKEMURA Shin wrote:
> I can't agree with you more. Yes, I've known that is better than
> my proposal, however, I'm afraid that it's too hard for us to do.
> I want to know how are maintainers feeling about that. I don't
> persist in my proposal.
For as much as I'm maintaining bsd.pkg.mk, all I have to say is said. ;)
If others agree, would you want to work on integrating this?
You can be sure it'd be appreciated! :-)
> BTW, how did it go about too many I-nodes issue? It might be nice
> to concatenate all of pkg/ files into one file like RPM's spec file.
Uh, I haven't seen any serious proposal for a "one file approach", not
that I'd think that's much good. My "small (first) step" proposal is still
up, I just lack time (got suckered into the 1.5 release process ;).
Asami mentioned some script that he used to reorg the FreeBSD tree, but I
didn't get an answer on my inquiry for that script (yet).
Then again, this issue is really seperate to the subpackage/etc. thing. :)
Hubert Feyrer <email@example.com>