Subject: Re: Problem with misc/dialog
To: Thomas Klausner <firstname.lastname@example.org>
From: Ruibiao Qiu <email@example.com>
Date: 11/10/2000 11:55:06
On Fri, 10 Nov 2000, Thomas Klausner wrote:
>Mutt made me believe that Ruibiao Qiu wrote:
>So, HAVE_TRUE_NCURSES should only be defined if you _have to_ use
>ncurses, because the in-tree curses aren't good enough -- on 1.5_ALPHA
>you are in the happy position to not depend on ncurses, at least for
>this package, so it shouldn't be defined; also, this should happen
>automatically, without having to add any lines by hand.
I guess that's the reason: my in-tree curse is not good enough.
Actually, I am running a 1.5_ALPHA kernel with old userland
stuff, I think. I got
$NetBSD: curses.h,v 1.21 1998/01/30 04:33:32 perry Exp $
$NetBSD: Makefile,v 220.127.116.11 2000/08/24 02:19:59 fredb Exp $
What do you got there?
>You won't see HAVE_TRUE_NCURSES in the compilation steps though,
>because it's added in the make environment, not on the command line.
>For your reference, these are the bsd.p*.mk I currently have:
> $NetBSD: bsd.prefs.mk,v 1.19 2000/11/02 03:01:40 wiz Exp $
> $NetBSD: bsd.pkg.mk,v 1.597 2000/11/02 12:17:03 mjl Exp $
I have the same things here.
>Does that help?
It does. Thanks.
Ruibiao Qiu firstname.lastname@example.org
Research Assistant email@example.com
Applied Research Laboratory firstname.lastname@example.org
Department of Computer Science email@example.com
Washington University http://www.arl.wustl.edu/~ruibiao
Campus Box 1045 http://www.cs.wustl.edu/~ruibiao
One Brookings Drive Tel. (314)935-4163
St. Louis, MO 63130-4899 USA Fax (314)935-7302