Subject: Re: openssl-0.9.5a compilation fails
To: Thomas Klausner <email@example.com>
From: None <firstname.lastname@example.org>
Date: 11/08/2000 01:49:12
It seems somewhat happier with that. I remembered seeing in some
documentation somewhere that i could include stuff on the make line, like
i was doing. Guess it doesn't work all the time/or i read it wrong.
Thanks for the help, i'll sit and watch this compile now hopefully.
On Wed, 8 Nov 2000, Thomas Klausner wrote:
> Mutt made me believe that email@example.com wrote:
> > Here is a bit more log of the install attempt:
> > bash-2.04# make ACCEPTABLE_LICENSES+=fee-based-commercial-use install
> > ===> openssl-0.9.5a has unacceptable license: fee-based-commercial-use.
> > ===> To build this package, add this line to your /etc/mk.conf:
> > ===> ACCEPTABLE_LICENSES+=fee-based-commercial-use
> > => Checksum OK for openssl-0.9.5a.tar.gz.
> > ===> Extracting for openssl-0.9.5a
> > make: don't know how to make install-build-depends. Stop
> > *** Error code 2
> This may be a silly question, but: Have you tried actually adding the
> ACCEPTABLE_LICENSES line your /etc/mk.conf as the notice says? Perhaps
> do a `make clean' too before the next try.
> Thomas Klausner - firstname.lastname@example.org
> I think...I think it's in my basement. Let me go upstairs and check.
> -- M.C. Escher (1898-1972)