Subject: Re: make libtool pkg depend on c++rt0 pkg ?
To: Nick Hudson <firstname.lastname@example.org>
From: None <email@example.com>
Date: 10/06/2000 11:16:17
On Fri, 6 Oct 2000, Alistair Crooks wrote:
> On Fri, 6 Oct 2000 16:43:13 +0200 (MET DST), Hubert Feyrer wrote:
> > On Fri, 6 Oct 2000, Nick Hudson wrote:
> > > If everyone can agree at what they want to happen I can take a look at
> > > doing it. Todd's suggestion seems to make sense.
> > I don't really care, plus I'm not familiar with the internals.
> > So -=> Todd's the boss. :)
> Well, I do care (passionately) about what happens to things in pkgsrc.
> Having said that, it's a sane thing to do - go for it.
as long as we're sure that libtool isn't the only place that wants to link
c++rt0.o Ie, if there are other places in pkgsrc which do that without
using libtool, things will still not be quite right. I'm not sure if this
is the case or not.