Subject: Re: pkgsrc reorg
To: Johnny C. Lam <firstname.lastname@example.org>
From: Jerry Alexandratos <email@example.com>
Date: 10/05/2000 22:52:20
On Thu, Oct 05, 2000 at 09:05:23PM -0400, Johnny C. Lam wrote:
: Frederick Bruckman <firstname.lastname@example.org> writes:
: > On Thu, 5 Oct 2000, David Brownlee wrote:
: I've had the opposite experience. I've found it quite
: annoying to track down which patches need to be updated, added, or
: removed. To some extent, pkgdiff helps, but I find it's much simpler
: to generate one big patch.
: It should also be noted that having all the patches in one big
: file makes having a flattened the pkgsrc directory structure have only
: one file per package called patch versus, for some packages, 50+ files
: called patch-aa, patch-ab, ... , patch-by, patch-bz.
We may want to look at taking a page out of OpenBSD's book and think
about having all new ports use names like "patch-foo," "patch-bar,"
(where foo/bar are the names of the files or particular functions that
name: Jerry Alexandratos || Open-Source software isn't a
phone: 302.593.4322 || matter of life or death...
email: email@example.com || ...It's much more important
|| than that!