Subject: Re: When DEPENDS can be upgraded in place
To: None <>
From: Hubert Feyrer <>
List: tech-pkg
Date: 09/04/2000 13:07:59
On Mon, 4 Sep 2000 wrote:
> 	Is there any sense in introducing a new DEPENDS_XXX variable
> 	that indicates a 'make update' does not need to delete the
> 	dependent package?

I guess if 'make update' was smart, it could figure this out on it's

(Then again I still think that 'make update' is the wrong approach)

 - Hubert

*** Hubert Feyrer <>
*** FB Informatik, FH Regensburg, Pruefeningerstr. 58, 93048 Regensburg