Subject: Re: Question on package philosophy
To: James Chacon <email@example.com>
From: Hubert Feyrer <firstname.lastname@example.org>
Date: 07/25/2000 14:31:35
On Tue, 25 Jul 2000, James Chacon wrote:
> In at least one case right now you can't do an unattended make (cddbd has the
> config script). On things like this with cddbd what is the general opinion
> here? In my local copy I patched config.sh to take an override from mk.conf
> so I can just set the appropriate vars up and shoot off a long term build.
package that require user interaction are marked with IS_INTERACTIVE=yes,
and if you set BATCH=YES in your /etc/mk.conf, these packages are skipped.
Of course it would be nice to decrease the number of interactive packages,
You will face another problem when you simply compile things starting at
pkgsrc root: conflicts. A more proper way is to install a package, build a
binary package, then deinstall everything, and go to the next pkg. The
soon-to-come bulk targets will do that.
is the output of the last bulk build, of the 70 unpackages packages,
quite a number are interactive (not all, though!)
NetBSD - because Unix isn't just #include <linux.h>, i386, ILP32, ELF, ...!