Subject: Re: mail/sendmail8.10
To: None <firstname.lastname@example.org>
From: Hubert Feyrer <email@example.com>
Date: 07/24/2000 06:12:56
On Mon, 24 Jul 2000 firstname.lastname@example.org wrote:
> i looked at local tree. current situation in the tree is:
> pkgsrc/mail/sendmail: 8.9.3 + wide patch
> pkgsrc/mail/sendmail88: 8.8.8 (due to the license twist)
> the correct actions would be:
> 1. make pkgsrc/mail/sendmail.wide, for 8.9.3 + wide patch
> (copy from pkgsrc/mail/sendmail)
> (pkgsrc/mail/smtpfeed wants it)
> 2. upgrade pkgsrc/mail/sendmail to 8.11.0
> does it sound correct?
Wide patch is to get IPv6 going in old sendmail, right?
If that patch just adds a feature without disabling others (say IPv4) I'd
say to name it sendmail893 instead of sendmail.wide. #2 is ok - does
8.11.0 include IPv6 support by default?
NetBSD - because Unix isn't just #include <linux.h>, i386, ILP32, ELF, ...!