Subject: Re: xpkgwedge should be NO_MTREE
To: Johnny C. Lam <>
From: Hubert Feyrer <>
List: tech-pkg
Date: 07/13/2000 13:37:11
On Thu, 13 Jul 2000, Johnny C. Lam wrote:
> I think xpkgwedge should have NO_MTREE defined since the whole point
> of the package is to install everything under ${LOCALBASE} and not
> have to touch ${X11BASE}.  Does this sound right to anyone else?


 - Hubert

NetBSD - because Unix isn't just #include <linux.h>, i386, ILP32, ELF, ...!