Subject: Re: strict (developer) checks when compiling pkgs
To: David Brownlee <firstname.lastname@example.org>
From: Hubert Feyrer <email@example.com>
Date: 07/05/2000 14:50:34
On Wed, 5 Jul 2000, David Brownlee wrote:
> Wuuld you intend to make it the default after someone has taken
> that pass through to identify which packages need the bypass?
Not really - just as we do with the PKG_FUZZ thing right now
> Otherwise it won't be in force where it could be the most use -
> when people write packages for submission.
Well, I expect these people to have PKG_DEVELOPE=yes. Maybe we can teach
pkglint to make sure it's set. :)
> Maybe the error message could direct people to a specific
> section in Packages.txt?
NetBSD - because Unix isn't just #include <linux.h>, i386, ILP32, ELF, ...!