Subject: Re: mail/qpopper: mark it broken?
To: None <email@example.com>
From: Manuel Bouyer <firstname.lastname@example.org>
Date: 05/31/2000 09:20:36
On Wed, May 31, 2000 at 10:16:07AM +0900, email@example.com wrote:
> >> shouldn't we mark pkgsrc/mail/qpopper (2.53) broken for local exploit,
> >> and try to upgrade to 3.02?
> >> http://firstname.lastname@example.org
> >I think there's also a patch for 2.53 around ...
> I'm just curious (not objecting), is there any strong reason to
> stick to 2.5x? if there is I would like to know...
I don't know, I didn't try the 3.0.x serie :)
Manuel Bouyer, LIP6, Universite Paris VI. Manuel.Bouyer@lip6.fr