Subject: Re: location of man pages
To: David Brownlee <abs@netbsd.org>
From: Scott Aaron Bamford <sab@ansic.net>
List: tech-pkg
Date: 05/04/2000 22:49:04
sorry, what i should have said:
how come pkgsrc uses
${LOCALBASE}/man
and not
${LOCALBASE}/share/man
like basesrc does.

 - Scott

                              ("`-''-/").___..--''"`-._
 ------------------------------ `6_6  )   `-.  (     ).`-.__.`)
         sab@ansic.net |        (_Y_.)'  ._   )  `._ `. ``-..-'
  sab@zeekuschrist.com |      _..`--'_..-_/  /--'_.' ,'
 --------------------------- (il),-''  (li),'  ((!.-' ----

On Thu, 4 May 2000, David Brownlee wrote:

>	To keep to the ${LOCALBASE} hierarchy - same as bin, lib, sbin,
>	libexec etc.
>
>
>		David/absolute
>				       -- www.netbsd.org: No hype required --
>
>On Thu, 4 May 2000, Scott Aaron Bamford wrote:
>
>> Can someone tell me the reason pkgsrc installs its packages in
>> ${LOCALBASE}/man while basesrc uses /usr/src/share/man? how come
>> pkgsrc doesnt use share/man ?
>> 
>> tia.
>>  - Scott
>> 
>>                               ("`-''-/").___..--''"`-._
>>  ------------------------------ `6_6  )   `-.  (     ).`-.__.`)
>>          sab@ansic.net |        (_Y_.)'  ._   )  `._ `. ``-..-'
>>   sab@zeekuschrist.com |      _..`--'_..-_/  /--'_.' ,'
>>  --------------------------- (il),-''  (li),'  ((!.-' ----
>> 
>> 
>
>
>