Subject: Re: 1.4.2 vs. 1.4.2B
To: None <email@example.com,>
From: None <Havard.Eidnes@runit.sintef.no>
Date: 04/30/2000 15:28:50
> > Yes, this bites, but I don't think there's a way around it.
> Wasn't it a rule of the release branch not to make such changes?
> How I can't only upgrade the kernel on my stable boxes, but also
> need to find out which parts of the userland need upgrading. Bah.
Yes, there has been such a rule. Note that it was broken for 1.4.2
as well, in that ``struct vfsnode'' got bumped in size there too.
The bugfix is if I've understood fairly important, and as I said
above, I don't know of a way around it. =