Subject: RE: [Spruce-list] FreeBSD compile problem - possible solution
To: Ezra Story <firstname.lastname@example.org>
From: Rob Mohr <email@example.com>
Date: 04/25/2000 10:41:36
Arrrrgh. Well, so much for that idea. *sigh* And here I thought those GNU
guys generally had thier sh*t together...
[mailto:firstname.lastname@example.org]On Behalf Of Ezra Story
Sent: Tuesday, April 25, 2000 10:25 AM
To: Robert D. Mohr
Cc: email@example.com; firstname.lastname@example.org;
Subject: Re: [Spruce-list] FreeBSD compile problem - possible solution
"Robert D. Mohr" wrote:
> Just noticed that there *is* another POSIX threads package for NetBSD...
> GNU Pth - The GNU Portable Threads. I'm trying to build that on my
> now... Not sure how I'll get the NetBSD Spruce package installer to
> recognize that it's there...
> NetBSD package guys... any ideas?
GNU Pth is cooperatively switched, which makes it basically useless for
things that use pthreads, including spruce. (Yes, I tried it).
Spruce-list mailing list