Subject: Re: changing "make package" destination name
To: None <email@example.com>
From: Greg A. Woods <firstname.lastname@example.org>
Date: 03/29/2000 11:36:41
[ On Wednesday, March 29, 2000 at 01:13:17 (+0100), David Brownlee wrote: ]
> Subject: Re: changing "make package" destination name
> Generally two different packages is best - in some cases having
> the -x11 package depend on the other can be good.
Except in rare cases where the package's binaries are statically linked,
or where the x11 (or whatever optional) component is highly optional at
runtime, etc., it is vitally important that there be separate packages
in order to properly support binary packaging.
Greg A. Woods
+1 416 218-0098 VE3TCP <email@example.com> <robohack!woods>
Planix, Inc. <firstname.lastname@example.org>; Secrets of the Weird <email@example.com>