Subject: Re: tkcvs
To: Laine Stump <email@example.com>
From: Hubert Feyrer <firstname.lastname@example.org>
Date: 03/16/2000 17:13:16
On Thu, 16 Mar 2000, Laine Stump wrote:
> I recently started looking at tkcvs as I'm in the process of convincing a
> development group that they really should stop using that toy SourceSafe
> and switch to CVS, but some of them insist on having some sort of GUI.
Maybe have a look at cervisia, too.
> What is the policy concerning updating a package to a beta version (near
> as I can tell, this stuff is labelled as beta just because the
> maintainer hasn't gotten around to calling it "release")? I think this
> would be a worthwhile update to consider, especially since tkcvs-6.0 is
> now four years old (!)
The usual policy is stability. In that case, if you say that it's stable,
upgrading shouldn't be a problem.
Microsoft: "Where do you want to go today?"
Linux: "Where do you want to be tomorrow?"
BSD: "Are you guys coming, or what?"