Subject: Re: pkg-CHANGES.prev
To: Alistair G. Crooks <email@example.com>
From: David Brownlee <firstname.lastname@example.org>
Date: 02/24/2000 09:41:57
I'd rather avoid cluttering doc (but that can be solved by using a
I'd need to change changes2html to read the last two files in the
early part of the year (not a massive task), and we'd want to
update any references we have to pkg-CHANGES.
I would not have any objections (just thinking out loud)
On Thu, 24 Feb 2000, Alistair G. Crooks wrote:
> > pkg-CHANGES is now 136K. What do people think about moving
> > the old entries (say everything before september 1999) into
> > pkg-CHANGES.prev?
> I've no problems with doing that, but ...
> Why September 1999? I would prefer to do it in years i.e.
> pkg-CHANGES.1997, pkg-CHANGES.1998, pkg-CHANGES.1999 and pkg-CHANGES-2000
> Why the name "pkg-CHANGES.prev"? See above.