Subject: Re: RESTRICTED binary packages on
To: None <>
From: David Brownlee <>
List: tech-pkg
Date: 01/03/2000 15:17:03
On Thu, 30 Dec 1999, Christoph Badura wrote:

> Testing for RESTRICTED in the Makefile isn't enough. sets
> RESTRICTED automatically when KERBEROS is enabled.  And only the
> kerberised pkg is restricted.  Hmm... Looks like LICENCE and KERBEROS
> is supposed to be recorded in the BUILD_INFO for the binary pkg (The
> LICENCE for my ssh pkg isn't useful, though).  You could check for that
> in the actual binary pkg.
> Maybe we should put RESTRICTED into the BUILD_INFO too and be done with
> it.
	Most definitely - then we can ignore the pkgsrc src altogether
	when checking for RESTRICTED and just validate the binary
	packages. Is this on anyones TODO?

> >	    qpopper-2.53
> At least this one is likely to be a false positive.  It becomes restricted
> only if it is compiled with Kerberos support enabled.  I assume Kimmo missed
> that one when he rototilled the Kerberos stuff.

	I've tweaked lintpkgsrc to parse .if statements a touch better
	(it now qualifies as 'badly' :), so it no longer gets this