Subject: Re: threads pkgs [was: Re: CVS commit: pkgsrc]
To: Frederick Bruckman <firstname.lastname@example.org>
From: Rene Hexel <email@example.com>
Date: 12/30/1999 09:22:27
Frederick Bruckman wrote:
> The cleanest way would probably be to add a CONFIGURE_ARG to the
> package Makefile. I'll look at now.
Hmm, to me, it looks like pthread checking is done unconditionally,
but if you find a CONFIGURE_ARG, that would be 'nicer' than having a
patch. Just in case, I have attached my patch-aa that's removing this
> I'm building pth now, to try and reproduce the problem. So now, why is
> there a pth-current that's two revisions older than pth? Isn't it
> about time pth-current went into the Attic?
Well, since there actually is a newer development pth out there, we
should rather update our pth-current package. Any takers? ;-)