Subject: Re: New p5 Date-Calc package questions.
To: Simon Burge <>
From: Hubert Feyrer <>
List: tech-pkg
Date: 12/23/1999 04:17:01
On Thu, 23 Dec 1999, Simon Burge wrote:
> It looks like it's only if NOPIC is defined that PLIST-md.shared is
> used.  I guess it's conceivable that someone may not want shared
> libraries in /usr/pkg (_and_ that all packages do the right thing
> anyway).  Is there any rational use for this at all?  Methinks it's
> time to remove the PLIST-m* unless there's any good objections.

If perl builds shared objects (or whatever, as long as it's consistent) on
all archs, I'd love to see that die.

 - Hubert

NetBSD - Better for your uptime than Viagra