Subject: Re: New p5 Date-Calc package questions.
To: Simon Burge <email@example.com>
From: Hubert Feyrer <firstname.lastname@example.org>
Date: 12/23/1999 04:17:01
On Thu, 23 Dec 1999, Simon Burge wrote:
> It looks like it's only if NOPIC is defined that PLIST-md.shared is
> used. I guess it's conceivable that someone may not want shared
> libraries in /usr/pkg (_and_ that all packages do the right thing
> anyway). Is there any rational use for this at all? Methinks it's
> time to remove the PLIST-m* unless there's any good objections.
If perl builds shared objects (or whatever, as long as it's consistent) on
all archs, I'd love to see that die.
NetBSD - Better for your uptime than Viagra