Subject: Re: vim pkg again
To: Tim Rightnour <email@example.com>
From: Antti Kantee <firstname.lastname@example.org>
Date: 12/20/1999 20:59:36
On Mon Dec 20 1999 at 11:43:05 -0700, Tim Rightnour wrote:
> one possible option.. would be to make them not conflict.. but install
> binaries named "vim-gtk". And supply a "vim" script that could call
> the appropriate one. Or possibly just naming them "vim" "gvim" "xvim"
That is possible also. It would require that for a gui and non-gui
version of vim one would have to build vim twice. Also, one would not
get the same behaviour as with non-pkgized vim, which starts non-gui
version with 'vim' and a gui version with 'vim -g' or 'gvim', regardless
of which widget set was used.
> Just an idea.. Doesn't really matter to me either way.
I'd rather try to avoid this unless there is someone to whom it actually
"Never underestimate the power of the Lite side of the \Source/"
Antti Kantee / NetBSD \ 1973 <- draken \ / o
<email@example.com> / http://www.netbsd.org \ platters -> 1999 \ / |
______________/ Free Multiplatform UN*X \___________________\/__ |