Subject: Re: Ssh install
To: None <email@example.com>
From: Greg A. Woods <firstname.lastname@example.org>
Date: 12/03/1999 14:59:09
[ On Friday, December 3, 1999 at 10:05:11 (-0600), Wenchi Liao wrote: ]
> Subject: Re: Ssh install
> Either way, /etc/mk.conf (IIRC) isn't part of the ``standard''
No it's not, but it should be. I've done that for my production
builds. However I think /etc/mk.conf should only define variables used
in /usr/share/mk/*, not anything to do with pkgsrc.
So given the above I've also had it source /usr/pkgsrc/mk/mk.conf, or
. include "/usr/pkgsrc/mk/mk.conf"
. include "/usr/pkgsrc/mk/mk.conf.example"
My mk.conf.example is different than the distributed one, which is why I
must include it even if a local pkgsrc/mk/mk.conf doesn't exist.
Of course this should be made more programmable so that /usr/pkgsrc can
be changed to some arbitrary place with a variable such as PKGSRCDIR in
the same way /usr/src can be moved with BSDSRCDIR.
The above .include of $(PKGSRCDIR)/mk/mk.conf should really be done in
/usr/pkgsrc/bsd.pkg.mk too so that all the other non-pkg builds don't
have to include that file. I'll probably do that the next time I
localise a NetBSD release for myself.
(While we're in this area, how about renaming pkgsrc/mk to pkgsrc/Mk?
I.e. capitalise "Mk" so that it sorts separately from the category
Greg A. Woods
+1 416 218-0098 VE3TCP <email@example.com> <robohack!woods>
Planix, Inc. <firstname.lastname@example.org>; Secrets of the Weird <email@example.com>