Subject: Re: CVS commit: pkgsrc
To: Michael Graff <email@example.com>
From: Johnny C. Lam <firstname.lastname@example.org>
Date: 10/13/1999 14:21:54
Regarding PGSQL_USE_TCL in the PostgreSQL package, one of the things
on my TODO list is to get rid of this and separate out all the
interfaces to the DB as new packages. This allows more choices for
binary package users. I added the USE_TCL stuff before considering
the implications for binary package users, and I probably should have
removed it before originally committing.
-- Johnny C. Lam <email@example.com>
Department of Statistics, Carnegie Mellon University
Michael Graff <firstname.lastname@example.org> writes:
> Simon Burge <email@example.com> writes:
> > Note: I don't use lame :-)
> > This now means that you have less of a choice from a binary package POV.
> > Is this ok (look at my first comment - I don't use lame!)?
> For one, we can't distribute it as a binary, IMHO -- it probably
> infringes on patents in mp3 encoding.
> For two, I don't think this is any different than postgresql using tk
> -- that is optional, too, but most people just won't care. Those who
> do can build from source :)