Subject: Re: change to makepatchsum
To: None <email@example.com>
From: Alistair G. Crooks <firstname.lastname@example.org>
Date: 10/06/1999 01:02:05
> Anyone not happy with the following change to makepatchsum, so that it
> doesn't update the patchsum file if none of the sums change?
The only reason that I'm not happy with this is that I can't see
any reason for it. If the patches haven't changed, then there's
no reason to regenerate the patch-sum file. If they have changed,
then the new patch-sum file will need to be generated or the new
patches will not be applied. The only time I did a mass generation
of patch-sum files was when I generated them in the first place.
Obviously I'm missing something here.
So why is this patch necessary?