Subject: Re: graphics/gd
To: None <firstname.lastname@example.org>
From: Alistair G. Crooks <email@example.com>
Date: 08/27/1999 01:36:57
*** Individual's views on the validity of software patents are moot. ***
> I updated my copy of the graphics/gd package from 1.3p1 to 1.6.3 but
> noticed several issues which stopped me from committing the update.
> The problem is that old (including 1.3) versions of gd generate GIF files.
> However due do concerns over the copyright issues around the compression
> used in GIF, new (1.6.3) versions of gd do not support GIF's at all but do
> PNG instead. Here is the blurb from some of the gd documentation:
It has nothing to do with copyright, but everything to do with
patents. However, as a precaution, and, as I just noticed PR 7969
pointing out the situation yesterday - so I'm behind on things,
OK? - I upgraded the package to the latest version straight away.
> _HEY! READ THIS!_ gd 1.6.3 creates PNG images, not GIF images. This
> is a good thing. PNG is a more compact format, and full compression
> is available. Existing code will need modification to call
> gdImagePng instead of gdImageGif. _Please do not ask us to send you
> the old GIF version of GD._ Unisys holds a patent on the LZW
> compression algorithm, which is used in fully compressed GIF
> images. We are still investigating the legal issues surrounding
> various alternative means of producing a valid GIF file.
> so the problem is then that we have 4 other packages that depend on gd:
> net/mrtg -- could probably be updated to generate PNG's instead of GIF's
> www/webalizer -- specifically says to use gd-1.3, no newer, on its web
> www/php3-gd -- haven't looked into this one yet
> graphics/fly -- can be easily updated to produce PNG's intead of GIF's,
> however depending on what other scripts people have
> written that use fly, they may need updating as well.
> so, I see a couple options:
> 1) move the existing gd-1.3p1 package to graphics/gd13, have it install
> its components with unique names, and point the other programs which
> depend on gd to gd13. Then make a new package graphics/gd which is
> the more up to date version.
> I'm not sure if there are any copyright issues for us if we continue
> to distribute gd-1.3 with its compressed GIF producing code.
> 2) try and update the other packages and replace all GIF usage with PNG
> usage. I'm not sure when I could get this done especially since I
> don't use the other packages that depend on gd.
> 3) leave the existing stuff alone and make a graphics/gd-png package
> which goes forward with new releases of gd. There is still the issue
> of making sure there are no name clashes with the old gd or make a
> CONFLICTS entry.
> I'm not crazy about any of these.
I too am unsure of (1), and, as always with these things, will err
on the side of caution. (3) is not really viable, which leaves only
I also believe that (2) is the right way to go - if authors of
software which depends on gd are unwilling to update their software
to handle png, and as the popular web browsers are also capable
nowadays of rendering png graphics, I see no excuse. Just as we
have had to upgrade to png (and this is a positive step in the
right direction), so will everybody else in the open source movement
have to make the same transition.
PS. *** Individual's views on the validity of software patents are moot. ***
[Just in case you missed it the first time round]