Subject: [email@example.com: Re: detex-2.7 distribution terms]
To: None <firstname.lastname@example.org>
From: Ignatios Souvatzis <email@example.com>
Date: 08/08/1999 09:35:18
do we have any mechanism to signal to CD-ROM distributors that they have to
include the source code if they build a binary? (What do we do with GPL code?)
----- Forwarded message from Daniel Trinkle <firstname.lastname@example.org> -----
To: Ignatios Souvatzis <email@example.com>
Subject: Re: detex-2.7 distribution terms
In-reply-to: Your message of "Fri, 06 Aug 1999 23:40:46 +0200."
Date: Sat, 07 Aug 1999 18:57:40 -0500
From: Daniel Trinkle <firstname.lastname@example.org>
Ignatios Souvatzis <email@example.com> writes:
> I'm preparing a NetBSD(1) package(2) for detex-2.7.
> >From reading your README, I understand that distribution of your
> source archive is unlimited, as long as it is complete.
> Is this right? What about binary-only distributions (e.g., by somebody
> preparing a (semi-)commercial CD-ROM for a specific NetBSD platform)?
> Ignatios Souvatzis
I have no objection if the source code is included with the
distribution, or if it is available as a separate package
(i.e. detex-src) from the same source.
Daniel Trinkle firstname.lastname@example.org
Computer Science-1398 765-494-7844
Purdue University 765-494-0739 (FAX)
West Lafayette, IN 47907-1398
----- End forwarded message -----