Subject: Re: ACCEPTABLE_LICENSES
To: NetBSD Packages Technical Discussion List <tech-pkg@NetBSD.ORG>
From: David Maxwell <firstname.lastname@example.org>
Date: 06/10/1999 15:56:18
On Thu, Jun 10, 1999 at 02:40:35PM -0400, Greg A. Woods wrote:
> [ On Thursday, June 10, 1999 at 06:51:42 (+0100), Alistair Crooks wrote: ]
> > Subject: RE: ACCEPTABLE_LICENSES
> > You have missed the point.
> > Acceptable licences does not govern whether or not the distfile can be put
> > on a CDROM or stored on a mirror or other server.
I think to satisfy all, you need
ACCEPTABLE_LICENSES (which is USE of software requirements)
DISTRIBUTION_LICENSE (which involves ftp-mirroring, cdroms, email attachments)
Certainly some of the above like GNU-GPL-V1 may fit in both, but I think
it's needlessly convoluted to try to express 2 concepts in 1 variable.
David Maxwell, email@example.comfirstname.lastname@example.org --> Mastery of UNIX, like
mastery of language, offers real freedom. The price of freedom is always dear,
but there's no substitute. Personally, I'd rather pay for my freedom than live
in a bitmapped, pop-up-happy dungeon like NT. - Thomas Scoville