Subject: Re: ACCEPTABLE_LICENSES
To: Adam Ciarcinski <firstname.lastname@example.org>
From: David Rankin <email@example.com>
Date: 06/09/1999 12:41:49
On Wed, Jun 09, 1999 at 11:56:17AM +0200, Adam Ciarcinski wrote:
> Please check, some packages need 'no-commercial-use' set in
> ACCEPTABLE_LICENSES in /etc/mk.conf, and some (or only audio/festvox)
> need 'non-commercial-use'. Which one is right?
Since more packages use no-commercial-use, I would expect that this
is the better of the two.
The easy answer to this would be to send-pr a problem report on
audio/festvox indicating that "non-commercial-use" should be changed to
"no-commercial-use". Then I'm sure someone with commit privilages would
be happy to fix this.
David W. Rankin, Jr. Husband, Father, and UNIX Sysadmin.
Email: firstname.lastname@example.org Address/Phone Number: Ask me.
"It is no great thing to be humble when you are brought low; but to be humble
when you are praised is a great and rare accomplishment." St. Bernard