Subject: Re: bsd.pkg.mk proposal 2: file control
To: Simon Burge <email@example.com>
From: Todd Vierling <firstname.lastname@example.org>
Date: 05/21/1999 13:26:23
On Fri, 21 May 1999, Simon Burge wrote:
: At the moment, you need an /etc/mk.conf with something in to be able
: to type "make pacakge" and end up with something that can be dumped on
: ftp.netbsd.org (ie, covers licencing, crypto, etc). With the above
: variable set, I take it that this will be the case (I don't need a
: special /etc/mk.conf entry) when this gets implemented?
As an addendum, my Proposal 2 is actually more restrictive by default than
even the requirements of ftp.netbsd.org. For package tarballs uploadable to
ftp.netbsd.org, you would need ACCEPTABLE_DIST_LICENSES=source-dist-required
in order to build binary pkgs of GPL'd software.
This deals with the fact that the GPL requires a 3-year availability of
source on all binary distributions (Hello Manuel[?]! This is part of why we
can't Just Clean "distfiles").
-- Todd Vierling (Personal email@example.com; Bus. firstname.lastname@example.org)