Subject: Re: gimp depends on emacs?
To: None <email@example.com>
From: Matthias Scheler <firstname.lastname@example.org>
Date: 05/03/1999 22:59:56
In article <Pine.NEB.email@example.com>,
Jim Wise <firstname.lastname@example.org> writes:
> Having the files in pkgsrc is not redundant because it saves the user
> having to wait for emacs to download, [build, ]and install to generate
> files whose contents are known in advance.
Supplying a replacement tool to generate these files would do the same
without adding any redundant files. I was never NetBSD's method to go
for the quick and dirty hack.
So all you emacs haters stop complaining and start working.
Matthias Scheler http://home.owl.de/~tron/