One other question on this - it would be nice if
		pkg_delete pkgA pkgB
	worked the case when pkgA depended on pkgB :)
	Currently it warns on A, then deletes B

		David/absolute

                  -=- Why _do_ we crucify ourselves?  -=-

On Fri, 5 Feb 1999, Hubert Feyrer wrote:

> On Thu, 4 Feb 1999, Todd Vierling wrote:
> > chopps raised an interesting question about adding a recursive delete flag
> > to pkg_delete that would delete all pkgs which dependeed on the pkg in
> > question.
> > 
> > Are there any *technical* objections to this?  Procedural or sysadmin's
> > preference level objections to /dev/null please, it's been flamed that way
> > already and `I don't care'.
> 
> I don't think so - just call pkg_delete for all the @pkgdep's, and if
> something else needs that package, pkg_delete will gripe and not delete
> (unless the -f flag is given)
> 
> 
>  - Hubert
> 
> -- 
> Hubert Feyrer <hubert.feyrer@rz.uni-regensburg.de>
>