Subject: Re: package conflicts
To: Zdenek Salvet <email@example.com>
From: None <firstname.lastname@example.org>
Date: 08/19/1998 11:42:06
On Wed, 19 Aug 1998, Zdenek Salvet wrote:
> I have noticed egcs-19980608 and f2c-19980516 use the same names
> for important files (the contents are different):
I agree that I would like to eliminate the conflict.
> I suggest to change the names
> /usr/pkg/bin/f77 -> /usr/pkg/bin/f2c-f77 for f2c-* package
This one sounds good to me. As far as I know the only other package this
will affect is scilab (and I haven't send-pr submitted it yet so I can fix
that). I'll try to find some time in the next week or so to update the
> /usr/pkg/lib/libf2c.a ->
> /usr/pkg/lib/gcc-lib/i386--netbsd/egcs-2.91.40/libf2c.a for egcs-19980516
> /usr/pkg/include/f2c.h -> /usr/pkg/lib/gcc-lib/include/f2c.h for egcs-19980516
I won't comment on this not being the egcs maintainer (or even a casual
egcs user). Is there a reason that egcs has f2c.h and libf2c.a? Does
this mean it also installs f2c? If so, perhaps, egcs should not install
f2c or only do it as a "DEPEND" thing (so it causes the f2c package to
> PS. Please add -fPIC support to f2c-f77 of lang/f2c package,
ok. Unless I get an email in the next few days saying why I shouldn't do
this when I update the f2c package, then I'll add it.
Not to ask a stupid question, but what exactly does that do?
"-fPIC If supported for the target machine, emit position-
independent code, suitable for dynamic linking,
even if branches need large displacements."
I'm not sure I understand....