Subject: Re: xpkgwedge vs. USE_X11 vs. ?
To: Hubert Feyrer <email@example.com>
From: Todd Vierling <firstname.lastname@example.org>
Date: 07/31/1998 16:27:00
On Fri, 31 Jul 1998, Hubert Feyrer wrote:
: OK, here's how I understand things after doing so:
: We use PREFIX for referenging to a pkg's own files.
: For other libs & includes, we'll use LOCALBASE and X11BASE as
: appropriate. This implies I know a pkg is in LOCALBASE or X11BASE - is
: this intended?
It's not intended, but there's no way around it. Hence, if you want
something installed by an X11 pkg, you use _both_. If you want something
installed by a non-X11 pkg, you're safe using only LOCALBASE.
: So USE_X11 to indicate this really wants X to compile run and
: make USE_IMAKE independent of this to get the X configuring stuff invoked?
Well, USE_IMAKE is really just a superset of USE_X11. And:
: With the result that each one might be set individually but that one
: doesn't imply the other (some Imake-pkgs that don't use the X window
: system come to my mind - tcsh, ...). Does this make sense?
Anything that _must_ use imake should depend on X, because that's where
imake is. tcsh has a GNU-style configure system, too. So, if it really
doesn't use X except for imake, make a Makefile out of a patchfile. 8-)
-- Todd Vierling (Personal email@example.com; Bus. firstname.lastname@example.org)