Subject: Re: use of share vs lib
To: Jim Bernard <firstname.lastname@example.org>
From: Todd Vierling <email@example.com>
Date: 07/31/1998 10:32:11
On Fri, 31 Jul 1998, Jim Bernard wrote:
: So the perl library tree _can_ perfectly well be shared among machines
: of varying architectures, and could quite reasonably be installed in
: share. However, it's installed in lib instead, polluting that tree
This can be fixed with proper patching.
Perl does segregate architecture-dependent files into their own
subdirectories. I can see this fixed by pre-polluting some of the directory
names given to "Configure". I'll make note to check up on the feasibility
of this later (among other changes to perl).
-- Todd Vierling (Personal firstname.lastname@example.org; Bus. email@example.com)