Subject: appropriate CCD interleave for LFS
To: None <tech-perform@netbsd.org>
From: Blair Sadewitz <blair.sadewitz@gmail.com>
List: tech-perform
Date: 11/07/2006 23:04:31
Would using a ccd equal to LFS' big block size result in near-optimal
or optimal performance for, let's say, compiling large amounts of
source and/or general desktop use?

The other strategy I've heard of is using [large] prime numbers; is
this more appropriate for ffs due to the fact that it ensures that
inodes are evenly distributed among all components?

Am I mistaken on any point here?


Thanks a lot,

-Blair

-- 
Support WFMU-FM: free-form radio for the masses!

<http://www.wfmu.org/>
91.1 FM Jersey City, NJ
90.1 FM Mt. Hope, NY

"The Reggae Schoolroom":
<http://www.wfmu.org/playlists/RS/>