On Sat, 3 Sep 2005, Pavel Cahyna wrote:
>>> Also using UFS1 instead of UFS2 (if you don't want to use
>>> LFS) might help.
>
> Because UFS2 has inodes twice as large than UFS1 IIRC, so it means more
> data going to/from disks and more buffer space wasted. But I never
> actually did a performance comparison.

Let us know when you did. I'm sure the 4 bytes per file have a huge 
performance impact.


  - Hubert