Subject: Re: Interactive responsiveness under heavy I/O load
To: Hauke Fath <hauke@Espresso.Rhein-Neckar.DE>
From: David Brownlee <firstname.lastname@example.org>
Date: 01/27/2004 19:37:28
On Tue, 27 Jan 2004, Hauke Fath wrote:
> At 23:43 Uhr +0100 26.1.2004, Johnny Billquist wrote:
> >> Softdep is such a huge performance win, especially for tasks like
> >> extracting a pkgsrc tree, because lots of metadata writes update
> >> the same disk block repetitively (think about adding files one at a
> >> time to the same directory). With softdep, each of these updates is
> >> done in memory (without the sync disk wait) and the resulting final
> >> directory blocks written to disk (again, speaking very broadly).
> >softdep:s really sounds nice, but last I tried it (a few months ago) it
> >still crashed my VAX very predictably, so I'd guess it still isn't good
> >enough to turn on for people in general.
> Same here on a SparcStation 10. Both with current and 1.6 kernels, softdep
> mounts make sure the box locks up during the next /etc/daily run.
I'm running softdeps on a 1.6.1_STABLE, alpha and sparc5 as
reasonably loaded NFS servers, and on 1.6ZI sparc & sparc64 boxes
as NFS clients (twenty or so users).
Also on i386 boxes, but those are less interesting :)
Alpha has been up for 165 days (I forget why it was rebooted),
sparc5 tends to go down every few months. Client boxes running
current are a little harder to benchmark as they keep getting
I'm pretty sure there are still softdep problems, or problems
elsewhere exposed by softdeps pushing things harder...
David/absolute -- www.netbsd.org: No hype required --