Subject: Re: revised two-level bitmap fdalloc diff
To: Niels Provos <provos@citi.umich.edu>
From: enami tsugutomo <enami@but-b.or.jp>
List: tech-perform
Date: 10/30/2003 00:45:19 
- Does the gcc optimize the 2nd find_next_zero() call (i.e., call for
  lomap) well?  Anyway, I guess it is better to factor out the code to
  pick up available bit in given 32bit word, and use it directly for
  lomap search.

- Was the choise of `a bit not set' to describe unused descriptor
  better than `a bit set' to describe it?

enami.