Subject: Re: Some LFS vs. FFS+softdep testresults
To: Frank van der Linden <fvdl@netbsd.org>
From: Wojciech Puchar <wojtek@tensor.3miasto.net>
List: tech-perform
Date: 03/30/2003 09:06:10
>
> FFS:
> -------Sequential Output-------- ---Sequential Input-- --Random--
> -Per Char- --Block--- -Rewrite-- -Per Char- --Block--- --Seeks---
> Machine MB K/sec %CPU K/sec %CPU K/sec %CPU K/sec %CPU K/sec %CPU /sec %CPU
> 2000 49712 46.0 47548 19.3 11092 3.8 47817 49.0 48925 9.6 217.4 1.2
>
>
> LFS:
> -------Sequential Output-------- ---Sequential Input-- --Random--
> -Per Char- --Block--- -Rewrite-- -Per Char- --Block--- --Seeks---
> Machine MB K/sec %CPU K/sec %CPU K/sec %CPU K/sec %CPU K/sec %CPU /sec %CPU
> 2000 34875 40.8 39680 26.9 22030 17.2 47937 49.1 46426 9.1 240.1 1.3
with much higher CPU load. doesn't lfs do extra memory-to-memory copy
somewhere?