Subject: Re: Performance of various memcpy()'s
To: David Laight <david@l8s.co.uk>
From: Bang Jun-Young <junyoung@mogua.com>
List: tech-perform
Date: 10/16/2002 23:57:18
On Wed, Oct 16, 2002 at 12:12:01AM +0100, David Laight wrote:
> Oh - why not write assembler in assembler?
I don't understand either. Anyway, that's the way Linux people write
code. ;-/
> The 'asm' statements are epically hard to read :-(
> (I might try decoding them tomorrow.)
gcc -S is your friend. ;-)
Jun-Young
--
Bang Jun-Young <junyoung@mogua.com>