On Wed, 27 Mar 2002, Rick Kelly wrote:

> >
> >    # m68k
> >    *\(68020\))         FLAGS='-m68020'                 ;; # Untested
> >    *\(68030\))         FLAGS='-m68030'                 ;; # Mac LC III
> >    *\(68040\))         FLAGS='-m68040'                 ;; # Untested
> >    *\(68060\))         FLAGS='-m68060'                 ;; # Untested
>
> I found it. I grabbed the wrong copy. So we don't build GCC to minimally
> default to 68020?
>
	I'm pretty sure it defaults to 68020 or above. Ideally the
	default should run on 68020 or better, with instruction
	scheduling set to give reasonable performance across the
	board. -m68020 should specifically set the instruction
	scheduling to maximise performance on a 68020 even if it
	significantly impacts performance on a 68030 or better.

	Whether it does is another matter :) Though if it does at
	some later point cpuflags is ready for it :)

-- 
		David/absolute		-- www.netbsd.org: No hype required --