> 
> 	Chuck could answer better than I, but I imagine that the gain from
> 	making metadata buffers dynamic is not significant enough to make
> 	it worth working on at this point. Maybe when all filesystems
> 	perform close to optimally under UBC and the automatic tuning
> 	works fully then it might be time to address the static metadata
> 	cache.
OK but why it's still same amount of memory allocated for buffers? it
should be smaller.