Subject: Re: File system performance on i386
To: Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de>
From: R. C. Dowdeswell <elric@mabelode.imrryr.org>
List: tech-perform
Date: 02/23/2001 08:37:48
On 982921387 seconds since the Beginning of the UNIX epoch
Christoph Hellwig wrote:
>
>Due tue the caching alogoriths it is usually written in order -
>unlike synch were the synch metadata may hit the disk _before_ the
>actual data is commited. That is bad.
Uh, sync == data is written before metadata, period. It is enforced,
the situation that you are talking about is what mounting synch is
avoiding.
>>
>> If you really really think async metadata is the way to go, you can
>> mount async if you prefer to. IIRC there is no option to write
>> only metadata sync on ext2fs under Linux though.
>
>mount -o sync
This isn't quite the same as on BSD.
== Roland Dowdeswell http://www.Imrryr.ORG/~elric/ ==
== The Unofficial NetBSD Web Pages http://www.Imrryr.ORG/NetBSD/ ==
== The NetBSD Project http://www.NetBSD.ORG/ ==