On Tue, Nov 13, 2007 at 04:09:43PM +0100, Matthias Drochner wrote:
> 
> M.Drochner@fz-juelich.de said:
> > the case of an IPv4 route needs to be handled explicitely
> 
> The appended patch seems to dtrt. Not that clean yet, just
> wanted to show what I mean.

I think this is correct. You said it -- not pretty, but needed. Note
that this was broken before, but we didn't bother to check the route.

Joerg